{"id":3996,"date":"2026-03-27T11:46:42","date_gmt":"2026-03-27T11:46:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ribesalat.com\/?p=3996"},"modified":"2026-03-27T11:47:54","modified_gmt":"2026-03-27T11:47:54","slug":"geopolitical-risk-in-insurance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ribesalat.com\/en\/geopolitical-risk-in-insurance\/","title":{"rendered":"Geopolitical risk in insurance; how it affects your business and what you need to bear in mind"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Geopolitical risk is now one of the most significant factors shaping risk management for businesses, particularly those with international operations. It has a direct impact on insurance; geopolitical risk in insurance<\/strong> is no longer an abstract concern but rather a reality which affects coverage, premiums and exclusions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Against this backdrop, understanding how the insurance market responds is crucial to staying ahead of the curve and safeguarding business operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This article unpacks how geopolitical risk affects insurance, the changes taking place in policy coverage and what factors you need to consider to make more informed decisions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Table of contents<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
    \n
  1. Why geopolitical risk is back at the heart of the insurance industry<\/strong>\n
      \n
    1. Why geopolitical risk is no longer an isolated risk for businesses<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    2. What has changed in the insurance market<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    3. How geopolitical risk impacts insurance coverage<\/strong>\n
        \n
      1. Changes to the definition of terrorism<\/li>\n\n\n\n
      2. War clauses and war risk in transport<\/li>\n\n\n\n
      3. How a change in geopolitical risk classification affects insurance<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n\n\n\n
      4. Which sectors and businesses are most exposed<\/strong>\n
          \n
        1. Companies with international operations<\/li>\n\n\n\n
        2. Transport, logistics and energy<\/li>\n\n\n\n
        3. Impact on supply chains<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n\n\n\n
        4. The insurance market\u2019s response to geopolitical risk<\/strong>\n
            \n
          1. Capacity restrictions and higher premiums<\/li>\n\n\n\n
          2. Stricter technical requirements for underwriting<\/li>\n\n\n\n
          3. The role of reinsurance<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n\n\n\n
          4. What firms should do in this scenario<\/strong>\n
              \n
            1. Reviewing coverage and exclusions<\/li>\n\n\n\n
            2. How to anticipate the geopolitical impact on logistics routes and international operations<\/li>\n\n\n\n
            3. Building the geopolitical variable into risk management<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n\n\n\n
            4. Insurance as a strategic tool in an uncertain landscape<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

              Why geopolitical risk is back at the heart of the insurance industry<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

              Over the last few months, several scenarios have brought the relationship between geopolitics and insurance back into the spotlight. What is significant is not just the event itself but also how these incidents are compelling the market to reinterpret risk.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              A prime example is Mexico, where measures to combat organised crime have led to outbreaks of violence with a direct impact on the economy such as roadblocks and harm to businesses. At the same time, escalating tensions in the Middle East have once more thrust strategic areas for international trade to the forefront with direct implications for key shipping routes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              The point here is not to compare the two situations but rather to grasp that, although they are different scenarios, both have a common effect; they alter the perception of risk and, consequently, the insurance response<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              Why geopolitical risk is no longer an isolated risk for businesses<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

              For years, many businesses have viewed geopolitical risk as an isolated or localised issue. However, today\u2019s context reveals a different reality; we are talking about a situation involving numerous overlapping and interrelated sources of tension. The Allianz Risk Barometer<\/strong><\/a> says political risks and violence have ranked among the top ten risks for businesses globally for three years in a row.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              For example, a company which exports to various markets may be hit not only by a direct conflict in a specific country but also by the indirect impact on logistics routes or suppliers based in sensitive areas. It is this shift in scale which makes geopolitical risk in insurance<\/strong> a structural factor that businesses can no longer ignore in their operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              What has changed in the insurance market<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

              When the perception of risk changes, the insurance market reacts. And it does so primarily in three ways: by redefining cover, adjusting terms and conditions, and reviewing available capacity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              \n

              \u201cThe same event can elicit a different response from insurers depending on how it is classified. And that\u2019s where companies need to pay special attention to their policies,\u201d<\/em> says Sandra Samart\u00edn, Corporate Director at Rib\u00e9Salat.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

              A good example is the broadening of the definition of terrorism by some insurers to include specific actions associated with organised crime. This might seem like a technical nuance, yet it has some very practical ramifications; the same loss may be covered or excluded depending on how it is interpreted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              Another relevant case is war coverage in international transport. On routes going through sensitive areas such as the Persian Gulf or the Red Sea, changes in the geopolitical context can trigger specific clauses, push up premiums or even restrict coverage depending on the itinerary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              In practice, this means insurance conditions are no longer set in stone<\/strong> but rather change depending on the circumstances. For businesses, this entails the need to continually review their insurance programmes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              How geopolitical risk impacts insurance coverage<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

              When the topic of geopolitical risk comes up, many companies see it as something distant or hard to relate to their routine operations. Nonetheless, its impact on insurance is direct and, in many cases, immediate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              The key point lies in how events are interpreted. Vandalism is not the same as terrorism, nor is a stable area comparable to one caught up in conflict. It is this change in classification that determines whether a policy pays out\u2026 or not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              \"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

              Changes to the definition of terrorism<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

              One of the most significant developments in the insurance market is the broadening of the definition of terrorism to include specific actions associated with organised crime.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              This has obvious consequences. For a business, this means a loss may not be eligible for coverage if its classification changes. Many property policies cover public disorder or vandalism but exclude terrorism. If the same event is reclassified under this category, the coverage may no longer apply.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              In Spain, moreover, this impact is particularly significant due to the structure of the insurance system. In property insurance there is a compulsory surcharge to fund the Insurance Compensation Consortium<\/a> whose remit takes in extraordinary risks such as terrorism. This means that in such cases, even if the private policy excludes terrorism the insured may still be able to claim compensation through the Consortium.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              However, this protection is not all-encompassing. The Consortium does not apply to lines such as transport, international risks or multinational programmes. In these cases, terrorism coverage has to be expressly arranged on the insurance market, usually through specific clauses or specialised policies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              Consequently, the same event can have very different insurance implications depending on the type of policy and the territorial limit. What might be covered by the Consortium under a property insurance policy in Spain could be completely excluded under an international programme if it has not been appropriately provided for.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              For example, an incident such as blocking infrastructure or damage to businesses in certain regions may be interpreted differently depending on the context and the evolution of the risk. And it is that interpretation, coupled with the structure of the cover taken out, which makes the difference in the compensation paid.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              War clauses and war risk in transport<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

              The impact is even more palpable in international transport. Standard policies typically exclude risks of war, armed conflict or hostile acts between states, which require specific cover known as war risk. <\/em>In the case of cargo insurance<\/strong><\/a>, these conditions may be triggered or amended depending on the route.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              When an area is deemed to be especially unstable, this cover may be made compulsory, become more expensive or even restricted based on the route. In practice, this leads to higher costs and greater complexity in insurance management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              Strategic routes such as the Persian Gulf and the Red Sea are a case in point. Any shift in geopolitical tensions is reflected almost immediately in insurance terms, directly impinging on businesses reliant on maritime transport.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              How a change in geopolitical risk classification affects insurance<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

              Aside from specific covers, there is one aspect which often slips under the radar; insurance is an ever-changing beast in these settings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              \n

              \u201cInsurance covers aren\u2019t set in stone. They can be triggered, restricted or altered depending on how the risk evolves in a specific area,\u201d <\/em>points out Sandra Samart\u00edn.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

              In practice, this means that a company may see changes to its insurance terms in response to:<\/p>\n\n\n\n